Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.2% pass rate
from 391 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.77% fail on Dipswitch (23 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.26% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.26% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.51% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.51% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.26% fail on Mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.51% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Towbar (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Vehicle structure (28 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on System (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pipe
      • 0.26% fail on Tank
      • 0.26% fail on Hose
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.77% fail on Door condition
      • 0.51% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
        • 0.26% fail on Hinge
    • 2.0% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Passenger's seat (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.5% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Other body component (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Prop shaft (28 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints
    • 0.77% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 13% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Drag link end (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Other components (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Steering linkage (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.26% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.26% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Operation (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Other components
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.26% fail on Pump
    • 0.51% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.51% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Steering play
      • 0.51% fail on Steering box (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.77% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.26% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.26% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.51% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Pedal
    • 0.51% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Servos (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.51% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.26% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.51% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.26% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.26% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.51% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.51% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages