Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.8% pass rate
from 353 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.28% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.28% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.85% fail on Rear reflectors (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.57% fail on Switch
      • 0.28% fail on Lamp
    • 0.57% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 15% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 1.7% fail on Rear
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Axles (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Swivel joints/housing (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Clearance
    • 0.57% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.57% fail on Panhard rods (36 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.28% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 13% fail on Steering (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 4.0% fail on Drag link end (32 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Free play
        • 0.57% fail on Steering box (50 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering box (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Intermediate drop arm (122 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering damper (44 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.85% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering control
      • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
    • 2.0% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Drivers
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel
  • 11% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.4% fail on Components
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
      • 0.85% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.28% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.28% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.28% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 9.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.2% fail on Towbars (52 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Vehicle structure (53 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Towbar (34 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Cap
    • 0.57% fail on Emissions (91% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (80% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages