MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender 110 » 1999

Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
53.8% pass rate
from 316 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Tell tale
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.32% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.63% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Trailer electrical socket (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Battery
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.63% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear
    • 1.6% fail on Axles (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Swivel joints/housing (33 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.63% fail on Panhard rods (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (31 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.32% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.32% fail on Universal joint
  • 16% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Drag link end (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Steering box (45 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Free play (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Steering box (43 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Steering pivot point (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.32% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.32% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.95% fail on Steering control (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.32% fail on Steering column
      • 0.32% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.32% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.95% fail on Steering operation (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
    • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Locking devices
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 6.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.63% fail on Hoses
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Front wheels (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.32% fail on Rear wheels
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.63% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.95% fail on Condition
    • 0.95% fail on ABS
    • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
        • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.32% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Body condition
    • 2.2% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Drivers
    • 0.95% fail on Seats
      • 0.63% fail on Passengers
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.9% fail on Towbars (37 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Vehicle structure (42 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Towbar
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on System (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Tank
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions (81% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Requirements
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages