Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results
Registered in 199953.8% pass rate
from 316 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Tell tale
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp
-
0.32% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.32% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.32% fail on Switch
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.8% fail on Front lamps
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.63% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Switch
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Trailer electrical socket (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Battery
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.63% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear
-
1.6% fail on
Axles
(17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Swivel joints/housing (33 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Suspension arms
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.63% fail on
Panhard rods
(20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (31 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.32% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.32% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.32% fail on Universal joint
-
0.32% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
6.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Drag link end (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Steering box (45 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Free play
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Steering box (43 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Other components
(13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Steering pivot point (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.32% fail on Steering damper
- 0.32% fail on Steering arm
-
0.95% fail on
Steering control
(12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.32% fail on Steering column
-
0.32% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.32% fail on Universal joint
- 0.95% fail on Steering operation (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Power steering
- 0.32% fail on Operation
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.32% fail on Other components
- 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Locking devices
-
14% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.3% fail on
Components
- 6.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.63% fail on Hoses
- 0.32% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.32% fail on Leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Components
-
3.8% fail on
Brake performance
(60% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Front wheels (81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.32% fail on Rear wheels
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.63% fail on Brake discs
- 0.63% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.95% fail on Condition
- 0.95% fail on ABS
-
0.95% fail on
Prescribed areas
(10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.32% fail on
Pedal
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Pedal
-
0.32% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.32% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
7.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Body condition
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Drivers
-
0.95% fail on
Seats
- 0.63% fail on Passengers
- 0.32% fail on Drivers
-
5.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.32% fail on Bonnet
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
-
7.9% fail on
Towbars
(37 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Vehicle structure (42 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Towbar
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(56% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on System (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Tank
- 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions (81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.32% fail on Requirements
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate