Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.9% pass rate
from 356 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.56% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.7% fail on Towbar (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Vehicle structure (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Prop shafts (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Prop shaft (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.56% fail on Door condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Tank
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.28% fail on System
    • 0.56% fail on Floor
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.28% fail on Cabs
      • 0.28% fail on Steps
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (90% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
    • 0.84% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.84% fail on Lever
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.84% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.56% fail on Air and vacuum systems (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Servos (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Servos
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.0% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on King pins
      • 0.28% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 0.84% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.56% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.28% fail on Mounting
      • 0.56% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.84% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
  • 14% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Drag link end (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Steering arm (37 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
        • 0.28% fail on Steering component
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering box (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.84% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.28% fail on Pump
    • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Steering coupling (41 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Universal joint (44 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.28% fail on Steering play
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (65% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plates (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.28% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages