Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.7% pass rate
from 150 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Position lamps (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (122 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.3% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Individual lamps (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
    • 8.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Lamp
      • 0.67% fail on Switch
      • 0.67% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Rear
      • 0.67% fail on Front
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.7% fail on Component mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Panhard rods (23 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Axles (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on King pins
      • 0.67% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.67% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.67% fail on Location
    • 0.67% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.67% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.67% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Steering system (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering arm (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Steering box
    • 2.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
      • 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.67% fail on Other components
    • 1.3% fail on Steering control (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering coupling (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Universal joint (17 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.67% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.7% fail on Chassis
    • 2.7% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Drivers
      • 0.67% fail on Passengers front
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
  • 9.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.67% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.67% fail on System
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.7% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.67% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.67% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.67% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
        • 0.67% fail on Anti-slip
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Attachment (29 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.3% fail on Towbars (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres
    • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.67% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.67% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages