Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
64.7% pass rate
from 150 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.67% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.67% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.67% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension rods (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.67% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.67% fail on Axles
      • 0.67% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Springs
      • 0.67% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.67% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.67% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.67% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Other towbar components
    • 2.7% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Catch
      • 0.67% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition
    • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.67% fail on Body
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
    • 0.67% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.67% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
    • 0.67% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.67% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (83% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages