MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender 110 » 1994

Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
62.1% pass rate
from 227 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.88% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.44% fail on Switch
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.44% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.1% fail on Horn
    • 2.2% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Tell tale (21 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Battery
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear
    • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Axles (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on King pins (68 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Attachment (22 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.88% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Universal joint (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.44% fail on Location
    • 0.44% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 14% fail on Steering (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.88% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Other components
      • 0.44% fail on Pump
    • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering control
      • 0.44% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.44% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.44% fail on Steering operation
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.1% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.44% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Condition
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 3.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.88% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Drivers
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.88% fail on Seats
      • 0.88% fail on Passengers
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Tank
      • 0.44% fail on System
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions (84% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.88% fail on Size/type
    • 0.88% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Towbars (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages