Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results
Registered in 199462.1% pass rate
from 227 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.88% fail on Tell tale
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.0% fail on Front lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
-
0.44% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.44% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.44% fail on Tell tales
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Horn
-
2.2% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Tell tale (21 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Lamp
- 0.44% fail on Battery
-
7.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
4.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(190% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rear
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.0% fail on Component mounting
-
3.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.1% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Axles
(12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on King pins (68 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Trailing arms
(5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.88% fail on Attachment (22 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.88% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Universal joint (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.44% fail on Location
-
0.44% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
0.44% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.44% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.44% fail on Front suspension joints
-
4.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(190% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
14% fail on
Steering
(170% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(150% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Drag link end
- 0.88% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Other components
- 0.44% fail on Pump
- 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Steering control
-
0.44% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.44% fail on Universal joint
-
0.44% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.44% fail on Steering operation
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(150% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Brakes
-
4.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.1% fail on
Components
- 3.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.3% fail on Leaks
- 0.44% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Components
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.44% fail on Brake drums
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(78% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.88% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.88% fail on
Pedal
- 0.44% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.88% fail on
Pedal
-
0.88% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.44% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.44% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
4.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 4.0% fail on Body condition
-
3.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.5% fail on Chassis
-
0.88% fail on
Doors
- 0.44% fail on Drivers
- 0.44% fail on Passengers front
-
0.88% fail on
Seats
- 0.88% fail on Passengers
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.88% fail on Tank
- 0.44% fail on System
- 0.88% fail on Emissions (84% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.5% fail on Washers
- 1.8% fail on Wipers
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.88% fail on Size/type
- 0.88% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Towbars
(4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate
-
1.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment