Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
60.3% pass rate
from 131 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.76% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.76% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.76% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.76% fail on Switch
    • 0.76% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.76% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 14% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Drag link end (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.76% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.76% fail on Other components
        • 0.76% fail on Steering component
    • 0.76% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.76% fail on Steering box
    • 0.76% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.76% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Pump
    • 0.76% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.76% fail on Universal joint
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.1% fail on Axles (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Swivel joints/housing (26 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Axle
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.76% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.76% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.76% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on System (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Towbar
      • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 0.76% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.76% fail on Panel
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 0.76% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.76% fail on Door condition
      • 0.76% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.76% fail on Door condition
    • 0.76% fail on Bumpers
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.76% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.76% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.76% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt
          • 0.76% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
      • 0.76% fail on Hand lever
    • 2.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (18 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
    • 0.76% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.76% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 8.4% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.76% fail on Wipers
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.76% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.76% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.76% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.76% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages