Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 1989
66.2% pass rate
from 219 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (97% worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (97% worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.8% fail on Horn
      • 0.91% fail on Trailer electrical socket (32 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.46% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.91% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.91% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.91% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.91% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.91% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.91% fail on Switch
    • 0.46% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Door condition
        • 0.46% fail on Hinge
      • 0.91% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
        • 0.46% fail on Hinge
    • 1.8% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Towbar condition
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.46% fail on Tank
      • 0.46% fail on Hose
      • 0.46% fail on System
    • 0.91% fail on Seats
      • 0.91% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.46% fail on Transmission
      • 0.46% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.46% fail on Joints
    • 0.46% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.46% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.46% fail on Floor
    • 0.46% fail on Cabs
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.46% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.46% fail on Bonded suspension unit
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint (27 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints (10 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Axles
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.91% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.91% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.2% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.91% fail on Intermediate drop arm (9 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Steering component
        • 0.46% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.46% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.7% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.46% fail on Pump
      • 0.46% fail on Rams
      • 0.46% fail on Other components
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Steering coupling (9 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Steering play
      • 0.91% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.91% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (9 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages