Kia Shuma MOT Results

Registered in 2003
35.9% pass rate
from 92 tests in 2017
(32% worse than other 2003 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Shuma is unusually good or bad.

  • 41% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 34% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 25% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 18% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 8.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 6.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on ABS
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement
  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 9.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 8.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 6.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 14% fail on Tyres
    • 11% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Size/type (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Valve stem
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
  • 7.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis
    • 2.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages