Kia Shuma MOT Results

Registered in 2001
51.6% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Shuma is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.82% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Battery
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.82% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Horn
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.82% fail on Attachment
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 2001 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.1% fail on Component mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tie bars/rods (9 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.82% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.5% fail on Components
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes
      • 0.82% fail on Leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.82% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 7.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Size/type
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.82% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 2.5% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Passengers front (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.82% fail on Spare wheel
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.82% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.82% fail on Steering
    • 0.82% fail on Steering system
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.82% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages