Kia Shuma MOT Results
Registered in 200151.6% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Shuma is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
-
6.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.82% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Battery
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.82% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.82% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.82% fail on Horn
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.82% fail on Attachment
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2001 cars)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 2001 cars)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2001 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting
-
2.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
2.5% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(9 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2001 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.82% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.82% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2001 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 11% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.82% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
3.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.5% fail on
Components
- 2.5% fail on Pipes
- 0.82% fail on Leaks
-
2.5% fail on
Components
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.82% fail on Restricted movement
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.8% fail on
Tyres
- 7.4% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on Size/type
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 0.82% fail on Mirrors
-
7.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
2.5% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Passengers front (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Passengers other
-
1.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Chassis
- 0.82% fail on Spare wheel
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.5% fail on Emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
0.82% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.82% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.82% fail on
Steering
-
0.82% fail on
Steering system
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
-
0.82% fail on
Steering system
-
0.82% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate