Isuzu Bighorn MOT Results

Registered in 1994
57.4% pass rate
from 94 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Bighorn is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension rod
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Switch
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.2% fail on Horn
      • 1.1% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (92% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Joints
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.2% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
    • 2.1% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.1% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.1% fail on Servos
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Driver's view
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 3.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
    • 1.1% fail on Steering play
      • 1.1% fail on Steering box
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages