Daewoo Nubira MOT Results

Registered in 2003
46.3% pass rate
from 80 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Nubira is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 29% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.3% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake back plates
    • 3.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.8% fail on Components
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
        • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.3% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 15% fail on Component mounting (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.8% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 8.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Drivers (30 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Size/type
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 5.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages