MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daewoo » Nubira » 2000

Daewoo Nubira MOT Results

Registered in 2000
38.8% pass rate
from 67 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Nubira is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 16% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
      • 1.5% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 31% fail on Brakes (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 27% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 19% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 7.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.5% fail on Components
        • 6.0% fail on Pipes
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
    • 6.0% fail on Hub components
      • 6.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 4.5% fail on Restricted movement (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.5% fail on Leaks
  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 10% fail on Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.0% fail on Pipe (22 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Tyres
    • 9.0% fail on Condition
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Size/type
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system
      • 7.5% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Drivers

Search Good Garages