Daewoo Nubira MOT Results
Registered in 200038.8% pass rate
from 67 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Nubira is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Suspension
(72% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Attachment
-
13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
7.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.5% fail on Component mounting
- 1.5% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Location
-
1.5% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
1.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
31% fail on
Brakes
(82% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
27% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 19% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Front wheels
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
-
7.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.5% fail on
Components
- 6.0% fail on Pipes
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
-
7.5% fail on
Components
-
6.0% fail on
Hub components
- 6.0% fail on Brake pads
- 4.5% fail on Restricted movement (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 3.0% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 1.5% fail on Leaks
-
27% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 10% fail on Emissions
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 3.0% fail on Pipe (22 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
13% fail on
Tyres
- 9.0% fail on Condition
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Size/type
-
13% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.5% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 1.5% fail on Bonnet
-
7.5% fail on
Steering
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
- 7.5% fail on Track rod end
-
7.5% fail on
Steering system
-
1.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
- 1.5% fail on Drivers
-
1.5% fail on
Doors