Daewoo Musso MOT Results

Registered in 2002
35.1% pass rate
from 37 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Musso is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamps
      • 14% fail on Headlamp
    • 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 27% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt
          • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Hand lever (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Reservoirs
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts
        • 11% fail on Joints
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.4% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 2.7% fail on Door condition
      • 2.7% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 2.7% fail on Door condition
    • 2.7% fail on Chassis
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis condition
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 5.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Compression ignition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 8.1% fail on Steering gear (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Size/type

Search Good Garages