Citroen Nemo Multispace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
65.3% pass rate
from 798 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo Multispace is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Location (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 5.9% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.88% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.88% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.13% fail on Front
  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.88% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.75% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.50% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Horn
    • 0.25% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.6% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.88% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Rear wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.63% fail on Components
        • 0.50% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
    • 0.50% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.88% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on System
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions
  • 1.3% fail on Steering
    • 0.88% fail on Steering system
      • 0.75% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.38% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages