Citroen C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.6% pass rate
from 5,064 tests in 2017
(49% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 15% fail on Position lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 15% fail on Front lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.099% fail on All position lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.079% fail on Horn
    • 0.039% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.020% fail on Battery
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.099% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.020% fail on Size/type
  • 8.6% fail on Suspension
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Couplings
      • 0.020% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.020% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.020% fail on Location
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.020% fail on Condition
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension arms (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.079% fail on Front
      • 0.059% fail on Rear
    • 0.099% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
    • 0.039% fail on Air suspension (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.020% fail on Bellows
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.020% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Hub components (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.47% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.099% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Electronic parking brake (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.61% fail on Components
        • 0.45% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pipes
        • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.059% fail on Leaks
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical components (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Cable (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage
    • 0.14% fail on ABS
    • 0.039% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.039% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.039% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.020% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.79% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers other (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers
    • 0.079% fail on Body condition
    • 0.079% fail on Spare wheel (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Body security
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.55% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering system (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.059% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.53% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.020% fail on Tank
      • 0.020% fail on Pipe
      • 0.020% fail on Cap
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.41% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.020% fail on Halfshafts
  • 0.36% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Requirements
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
    • 0.079% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers airbag

Search Good Garages