Citroen C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.9% pass rate
from 5,999 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 13% fail on Front lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.083% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.033% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.017% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.017% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.017% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.050% fail on Battery (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.050% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.033% fail on Lamp
  • 12% fail on Suspension (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Front drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Couplings
        • 0.017% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.10% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
    • 0.87% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment
    • 0.77% fail on Front suspension joints (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Rear
      • 0.033% fail on Front (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.050% fail on Air suspension (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Operation (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.017% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.067% fail on Brake linings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.70% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.083% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.38% fail on Components (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Pipes (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Operation
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS
    • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability system (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition (18% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.067% fail on Size/type
  • 7.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Emissions
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on System (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.97% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Body condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Load security
      • 0.033% fail on Tailgate (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Access panel
    • 0.033% fail on Body security
  • 0.58% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.37% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.017% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.017% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Steering (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Steering system (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.067% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.050% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.033% fail on Towbars (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Towbar (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)

Search Good Garages