Citroen C3 Pluriel MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.2% pass rate
from 738 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Pluriel is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamps (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.27% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Individual lamps (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on All direction indicators
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.95% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Battery
    • 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Location
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Rear
      • 0.54% fail on Front
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.6% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (51% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Components (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes (61% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Leaks
    • 0.81% fail on ABS
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
        • 0.41% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Cap
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (79% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.41% fail on Body condition
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
    • 0.41% fail on Seats
      • 0.41% fail on Passengers
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.27% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.41% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages