MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » C3 Pluriel » 2004

Citroen C3 Pluriel MOT Results

Registered in 2004
48.6% pass rate
from 1,207 tests in 2017
(8.4% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Pluriel is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (38% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (54% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on All direction indicators
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamps (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Headlamp (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp (37% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Battery (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Horn
    • 0.50% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Coil springs (47% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts (67% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (66% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Rear
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.083% fail on General condition
    • 0.083% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.083% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (27% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.083% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.083% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.4% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses (77% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.33% fail on Leaks
      • 0.083% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (55% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.083% fail on ABS
  • 9.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
    • 0.083% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.083% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.083% fail on Cap
    • 0.083% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.083% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.083% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.99% fail on Condition
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 0.58% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.33% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Body condition
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers
    • 0.083% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.083% fail on Chassis
    • 0.083% fail on Body security
    • 0.083% fail on Load security
      • 0.083% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.58% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages