Citroen C3 Pluriel MOT Results
Registered in 200346.9% pass rate
from 802 tests in 2017
(9.6% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C3 Pluriel is unusually good or bad.
-
36% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(35% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim
-
9.5% fail on
Headlamps
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on All direction indicators
-
8.0% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.25% fail on Rear lamps (87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tell tale
- 2.2% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.12% fail on Lamp
- 0.12% fail on Switch
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
9.9% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Location
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
- 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.00% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.87% fail on Rear
- 0.12% fail on Front
-
0.87% fail on
Drive shafts
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Shock absorbers
(82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Component mounting
-
9.9% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.7% fail on
Components
- 5.6% fail on Pipes
- 1.00% fail on Hoses
- 0.37% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Components
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.25% fail on ABS
- 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
-
7.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Tyres
(39% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Tread depth (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Size/type
- 0.25% fail on Valve stem
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.6% fail on Washers
- 1.00% fail on Windscreen
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.4% fail on Emissions
- 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Cap
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
- 0.37% fail on Passengers front
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.12% fail on Passengers other
-
0.62% fail on
Seats
- 0.62% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.12% fail on Body security
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Steering arm
-
0.25% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
0.12% fail on
Steering control
- 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.12% fail on Steering operation
-
1.00% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(66% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.75% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.75% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.87% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.87% fail on Registration plate
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.62% fail on Attachment