Citroen Berlingo Multispace MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.7% pass rate
from 521 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo Multispace is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Battery
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.96% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.77% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.77% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.77% fail on Rear wheels (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.1% fail on Components
        • 1.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.19% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.19% fail on Hoses
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
    • 0.38% fail on Hub components (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.19% fail on Cable
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Passengers other (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Body condition
    • 0.58% fail on Seats
      • 0.58% fail on Passengers (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Body security
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Rams
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
  • 0.19% fail on Towbars
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages