Citroen Berlingo Multispace MOT Results

Registered in 2000
43.9% pass rate
from 551 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo Multispace is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.36% fail on Horn
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Front drive shafts (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Location
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.54% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.91% fail on Front
      • 0.91% fail on Rear
    • 0.73% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 14% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Valves (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 2.7% fail on Hoses
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.91% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.91% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Cable
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Emissions
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on System
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Size/type
    • 0.36% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.0% fail on Steering (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering system (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
  • 7.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.73% fail on Body condition
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.54% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages