Citroen Berlingo Multispace MOT Results
Registered in 200043.9% pass rate
from 551 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo Multispace is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.4% fail on Front lamps
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
-
6.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.91% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Tell tales
-
6.7% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Battery
-
0.36% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.18% fail on Lamp
- 0.18% fail on Switch
- 0.36% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(63% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Attachment
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Location
-
2.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting
- 0.54% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.18% fail on Spring mounting
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.91% fail on Front
- 0.91% fail on Rear
-
0.73% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.54% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.18% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(31% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Valves (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pipes
- 2.7% fail on Hoses
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.91% fail on Leaks
- 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
14% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.4% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.91% fail on Brake pads
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
0.36% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
-
0.18% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.18% fail on Cable
- 0.18% fail on ABS
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.1% fail on Emissions
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Pipe
- 0.18% fail on System
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.54% fail on Windscreen
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Condition
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.91% fail on Size/type
- 0.36% fail on Valve stem
-
8.0% fail on
Steering
(70% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(90% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Steering operation
-
0.18% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Other components
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(90% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Passengers airbag
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
4.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.73% fail on Body condition
-
0.54% fail on
Doors
- 0.54% fail on Passengers other
-
0.36% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
- 0.18% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.18% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.18% fail on Chassis
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.36% fail on
Towbars
- 0.18% fail on Towbar
- 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Attachment