Selling your classic car? It's FREE to list your car on Honest John Classics | No thanks

Alfa Romeo Alfasud MOT Results

78.3% pass rate
from 92 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for pre-1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Alfa Romeo Alfasud is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.2% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (17 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Servos
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.3% fail on Horn
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Pipe (9 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hose
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition
  • 8.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other pre-1990 cars)
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Condition