Aixam Crossline MOT Results

Registered in 2010
45.0% pass rate
from 40 tests in 2021
(60% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 23% fail on Rbt (sp) (39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 18% fail on Service brake performance (103 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 7.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 2.5% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 2.5% fail on Lever
    • 2.5% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 5.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Electrical equipment (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.5% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering gear (40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Steering rack (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.0% fail on Wheel bearings (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Joints
    • 2.5% fail on Seats
      • 2.5% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
  • 7.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)

Search Good Garages