Aixam Crossline MOT Results
Registered in 201045.0% pass rate
from 40 tests in 2021
(60% worse than other 2010 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
25% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 18% fail on Service brake performance (103 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt
- 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt
-
7.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
25% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs
-
2.5% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 2.5% fail on Lever
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 2.5% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
30% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
(14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Battery(ies)
- 2.5% fail on Horn
-
10% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
15% fail on
Steering
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering gear
(40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 10% fail on Steering rack (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Operation
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
13% fail on
Steering gear
(40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 5.0% fail on Wheel bearings (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.5% fail on Joints
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.5% fail on
Seats
- 2.5% fail on Driver's seat
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
-
7.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions