Aixam Crossline MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.7% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (68 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.6% fail on Lever
  • 13% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Steering gear (38 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Steering rack (40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 3.3% fail on Steering coupling (551 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Flexible coupling (4560 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Floor
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's seat
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages