Aixam Crossline MOT Results

Registered in 2008
51.8% pass rate
from 56 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Aixam Crossline is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 8.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.8% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.8% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.8% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.8% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 1.8% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.8% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Battery(ies) (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.6% fail on Other suspension component (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint (21 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.8% fail on Carrier
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 8.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 7.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering coupling (786 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Flexible coupling (5611 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering gear (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Steering rack (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.6% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages