Volvo V40 MOT Results

Registered in 2015
73.4% pass rate
from 15,944 tests in 2021
(40% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (63% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0063% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0063% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.031% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.013% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0063% fail on Axles
      • 0.0063% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0063% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0063% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (32% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition (45% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type (90% worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 3.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (17% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.78% fail on Headlamps (25% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp (30% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0063% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.55% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.55% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.038% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (93% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.019% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.013% fail on Electrical equipment (88% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0063% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.0063% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0063% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0063% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums (38% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs (38% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0063% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0063% fail on Linkage
    • 0.83% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0063% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Rbt
          • 0.069% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0063% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.069% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.069% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0063% fail on Pedal
    • 0.088% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.075% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.063% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0063% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.044% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.019% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0063% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0063% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0063% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0063% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.069% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0063% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.0063% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.019% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.019% fail on Undertray
  • 2.1% fail on Visibility (45% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on View to rear
      • 0.088% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.069% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.069% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.013% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0063% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.031% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0063% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0063% fail on Catch
      • 0.0063% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0063% fail on Door condition
    • 0.075% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.013% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.013% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Body
      • 0.019% fail on Other body component
    • 0.013% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.013% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0063% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0063% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.28% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.075% fail on Condition
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0063% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.088% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.013% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0063% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0063% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.013% fail on Steering play
      • 0.013% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0063% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.013% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (32 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Doors (36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Volvo V40 (2012 - 2019)
    Comfortable and enjoyable to drive, a good (if rather confusing) range of engines, fabulous record on safety.

    Search Good Garages