MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Yaris » 2009

Toyota Yaris MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.8% pass rate
from 26,161 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Yaris is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension (8.5% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Springs (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Coil springs (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Coil spring (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Mounting
      • 0.0076% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0038% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.0038% fail on Spring saddle
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0076% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension arm (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Sub-frames (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Sub-frame (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Other suspension component (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0076% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0038% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Headlamp levelling device (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.073% fail on Side repeaters (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment (37% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.099% fail on Horn (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0038% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.061% fail on Position lamps (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Position lamp (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.0038% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0038% fail on Switch
    • 0.0038% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0038% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.054% fail on Condition of glass (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.015% fail on Bonnet (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0038% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (43% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0038% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0038% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0038% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (65% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0076% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0076% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0038% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0076% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0076% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.011% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0076% fail on Cable (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Pivot
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.073% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Hand lever (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on Pedal
    • 0.038% fail on Parking brake control (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Lever (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic systems (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake fluid (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.0038% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.0038% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0076% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.0038% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0038% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.53% fail on Compression ignition (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (45% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0076% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.038% fail on Fluid leaks (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Engine oil leaks (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.015% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.015% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Prop shafts (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Joints (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on Belts
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Tank (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Pipe (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
      • 0.0076% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.088% fail on Body
      • 0.080% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0076% fail on Panel
      • 0.0038% fail on Body condition
    • 0.084% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.076% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0038% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0038% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.0038% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.080% fail on Chassis (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Chassis condition (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Front passenger's door (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Catch
      • 0.015% fail on Other passenger's door (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Catch
    • 0.015% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0076% fail on Engine mounting (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Engine mounting condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0076% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0076% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0038% fail on Seats
      • 0.0038% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.0038% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0038% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.73% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0076% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0038% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0038% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Steering (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Locking devices (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0038% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0038% fail on Other components
        • 0.0038% fail on Steering component
    • 0.034% fail on Steering gear (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
    • 0.015% fail on Steering play (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.0076% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0038% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0038% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages