Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 1995

55.0% pass rate

from 382 tests in 2021

(23% worse than other 1995 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

21% fail on Suspension (85% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 4.5% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.79% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.4% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.79% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.52% fail on Axles
  - 0.52% fail on Axle (33 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 18% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.26% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.26% fail on Catalytic converter
    - 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.26% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.26% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Other leaks
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.6% fail on Horn
  - 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.6% fail on Headlamp
- 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.0% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.79% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.52% fail on Position lamp
- 0.26% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.7% fail on Transmission
  - 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.4% fail on Joints
  - 0.26% fail on Halfshafts
- 1.6% fail on Chassis
  - 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 1.3% fail on Doors
  - 0.79% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.79% fail on Door condition
  - 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.52% fail on Door condition
- 1.0% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Body
  - 0.26% fail on Panel
  - 0.26% fail on Other body component
- 0.26% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.26% fail on Pipe
- 0.26% fail on Seats
  - 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
8.9% fail on Brakes
- 3.9% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.1% fail on Rbt
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.52% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      - 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.79% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 1995 cars)
      - 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.26% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.79% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.79% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
6.5% fail on Visibility
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.79% fail on Washers (79% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  - 0.26% fail on Window
5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 5.0% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.6% fail on Condition
  - 0.26% fail on Requirements
3.4% fail on Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.79% fail on Size/type (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Tread depth
2.6% fail on Steering
- 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.79% fail on Power steering
  - 0.79% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.26% fail on Operation
- 0.26% fail on Steering play
  - 0.26% fail on Steering rack
0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates