MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Proace » 2017

Toyota Proace MOT Results

Registered in 2017
76.3% pass rate
from 1,938 tests in 2021
(85% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Proace is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (70% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps (30 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Position lamp (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.052% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.052% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.052% fail on Cable
    • 0.93% fail on Brake performance (93% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal (35 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic braking system (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (67% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.52% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.052% fail on Undertray
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension
    • 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Springs
      • 0.31% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.31% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.052% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.052% fail on Joints
    • 0.15% fail on Body (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Panel (21 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
        • 0.052% fail on Catch
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.052% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.052% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.052% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.052% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.052% fail on Carrier
    • 0.052% fail on Towbar
      • 0.052% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.052% fail on Load security
      • 0.052% fail on Loading door
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements (28 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Condition
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Steering
    • 0.10% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.052% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.052% fail on Power steering
      • 0.052% fail on Rams

Search Good Garages