MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Proace » 2016

Toyota Proace MOT Results

Registered in 2016
65.1% pass rate
from 656 tests in 2021
(100% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Proace is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.76% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.76% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.30% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Transmission (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Joints (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (46 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (79 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility (85% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on Condition of glass (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Windscreen (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pedal (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.15% fail on Springs
      • 0.15% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages