Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2010
81.0% pass rate
from 846 tests in 2021
(50% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.35% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.35% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.95% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.35% fail on Axles
      • 0.35% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.71% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.35% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.59% fail on Transmission
      • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.59% fail on Joints
    • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.59% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages