Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon MOT Results

Registered in 2003
69.8% pass rate
from 126 tests in 2021
(31% better than other 2003 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.79% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.79% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.79% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.79% fail on Operation
  • 9.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.79% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.79% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.79% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 0.79% fail on Chassis
      • 0.79% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.79% fail on Cabs
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering
      • 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.79% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.79% fail on Steering play
      • 0.79% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.79% fail on View to rear
      • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.79% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages