MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2009

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2009
68.5% pass rate
from 451 tests in 2021
(21% better than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.67% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (47 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (48 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.44% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.67% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.44% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.22% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.22% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.44% fail on Washers (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.89% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.67% fail on Spark ignition (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.22% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages