MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2003

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2003
61.2% pass rate
from 1,674 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (36% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.96% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp) (50% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance (60% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.060% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
        • 0.060% fail on Linkage
        • 0.060% fail on Pivot
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.42% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.78% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.66% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.12% fail on Leaks
      • 0.060% fail on Servos
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
  • 14% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (39% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (74% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (65 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.060% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.54% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
      • 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.36% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Body (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.18% fail on Mounting fixings (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Panel
      • 0.060% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Steps
      • 0.060% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.060% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.12% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.060% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.060% fail on Carrier
    • 0.060% fail on Doors
      • 0.060% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.060% fail on Door condition
    • 0.060% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.060% fail on Undertray
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (24% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.060% fail on View to rear
      • 0.060% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.66% fail on Spark ignition (90% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Catalyst emissions (94% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested (83% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Transmission oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements
    • 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Airbags
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components (39% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end (39% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
        • 0.060% fail on Steering component
    • 1.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pump
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (65% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type
  • 0.96% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages