MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2002

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2002
63.9% pass rate
from 1,016 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.098% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.69% fail on Springs (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Axles
      • 0.30% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.098% fail on Operation
      • 0.098% fail on Levelling valve
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.89% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.89% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.98% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Linkage (47 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Pivot (77 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Lever
        • 0.098% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.098% fail on Pedal
    • 0.39% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.39% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Other braking system component (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Other components
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.098% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.098% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.098% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.89% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.20% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.098% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Body (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
      • 0.098% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.49% fail on Cabs (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Vehicle structure (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.098% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.098% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 4.1% fail on Visibility (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.89% fail on Power steering
      • 0.59% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.098% fail on Steering play
      • 0.098% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition (90% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.098% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.098% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.098% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages