MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Celica » 2002

Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 2002
60.4% pass rate
from 1,625 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.98% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.062% fail on Position lamp
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.062% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.062% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.80% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.74% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
  • 11% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage
    • 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring (35% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Sub-frames (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 9.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Catalytic converter (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.37% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.062% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.062% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.49% fail on Chassis
      • 0.49% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.49% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.062% fail on Panel
    • 0.18% fail on Undertray
    • 0.062% fail on Floor
    • 0.062% fail on Seats
      • 0.062% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.062% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.062% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.80% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.74% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages