Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1997
63.0% pass rate
from 392 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.77% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.77% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.77% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (69% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (81% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.0% fail on Emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Catalytic converter (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.26% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Other leaks
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.51% fail on Pipe
      • 0.26% fail on Tank
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.26% fail on Chassis
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.51% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.51% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.51% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Springs
      • 0.26% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.26% fail on Coil spring
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.51% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Airbags
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Steering
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages