MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Carina » 1995

Toyota Carina MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.7% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Carina is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.77% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.77% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.77% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Tyres (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Tread depth (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Size/type
  • 9.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
      • 1.5% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Body
      • 1.5% fail on Panel (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Other body component
    • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.77% fail on Chassis
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.77% fail on Doors
      • 0.77% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.77% fail on Catch
    • 0.77% fail on Seats
      • 0.77% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
  • 7.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.77% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.77% fail on Power steering
      • 0.77% fail on Other components
  • 3.1% fail on Suspension (73% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (19 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.77% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.77% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.77% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.77% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.77% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages