MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Aygo » 2010

Toyota Aygo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.1% pass rate
from 12,395 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0081% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0081% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (17% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.0081% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt
          • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0081% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0081% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0081% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0081% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.88% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.040% fail on Cable
        • 0.016% fail on Lever
        • 0.016% fail on Linkage
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.032% fail on Pedal (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.016% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0081% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0081% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.0081% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0081% fail on Valves
  • 8.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0081% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Switch (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Semaphore (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Switch (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Hazard warning (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
      • 0.081% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.024% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.024% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.024% fail on Position lamps (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Position lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0081% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.0081% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.073% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0081% fail on Window
    • 0.056% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.056% fail on View to rear (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0081% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Suspension arm (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.81% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.073% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage ball joints (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (99% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0081% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0081% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0081% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.42% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Other suspension component (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0081% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.024% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0081% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0081% fail on Axles
      • 0.0081% fail on Axle
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.35% fail on Transmission (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Sub-frame condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0081% fail on Pipe
    • 0.065% fail on Doors (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0081% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0081% fail on Door condition
    • 0.040% fail on Body
      • 0.024% fail on Other body component
      • 0.016% fail on Panel
    • 0.0081% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0081% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0081% fail on Seats
      • 0.0081% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.0081% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (26% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.024% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0081% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0081% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.073% fail on Compression ignition (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0081% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0081% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0081% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0081% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0081% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.024% fail on Fluid leaks (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Engine oil leaks (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.63% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0081% fail on Attachment
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0081% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0081% fail on Other components
        • 0.0081% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.056% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.040% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Steering rack (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Steering play
      • 0.040% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.024% fail on Power steering
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
      • 0.0081% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0081% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0081% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages