MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Avensis » 1999

Toyota Avensis MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.7% pass rate
from 985 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Avensis is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.20% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.10% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.10% fail on NOx sensor
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.20% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Hand lever
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.61% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (39% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.61% fail on Springs (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Coil spring (72% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.71% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.51% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
    • 0.41% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Joints (84% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Cabs
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (59% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.41% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Pump
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
    • 0.10% fail on Steering column
    • 0.10% fail on Steering play
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.10% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages