MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Alphard » 2003

Toyota Alphard MOT Results

Registered in 2003
72.9% pass rate
from 306 tests in 2021
(44% better than other 2003 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Alphard is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Switch
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 10% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.33% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (77% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (83% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.33% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Transmission
      • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
    • 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Doors
      • 0.65% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.65% fail on Door condition
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (71% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.98% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.33% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.98% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.98% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Requirements
  • 0.98% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Exhaust emissions (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested

Search Good Garages