Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.2% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.3% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 8.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.5% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages