Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2010

70.9% pass rate

from 711 tests in 2021

(20% better than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

12% fail on Brakes (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.1% fail on Rbt
      - 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.28% fail on Rbt
      - 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.5% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    - 0.28% fail on Brake drums (41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.14% fail on Cable
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
12% fail on Suspension
- 6.8% fail on Springs
  - 6.8% fail on Coil springs
    - 6.8% fail on Coil spring
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.98% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Swivel joints/housing (454 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.14% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.14% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
4.9% fail on Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.28% fail on View to rear
  - 0.28% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Driver's view
4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (48 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Chassis (61 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Chassis condition (63 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.14% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.14% fail on Pipe
- 0.14% fail on Towbar
  - 0.14% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.14% fail on Transmission
  - 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.14% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.14% fail on Body
  - 0.14% fail on Panel
3.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.98% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.14% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.14% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.14% fail on Switch
- 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.14% fail on Horn
3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
    - 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.28% fail on Non catalyst emissions (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
0.98% fail on Steering
- 0.42% fail on Steering linkage components (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Drag link end
- 0.42% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Pump (93 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
0.98% fail on Tyres (84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Tread depth (92% better than other 2010 cars)
0.42% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.14% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.14% fail on Condition
0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
0.14% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment