MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2005

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.6% pass rate
from 1,823 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (17% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.7% fail on Springs (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Coil springs (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Coil spring (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.055% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.055% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.055% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.055% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.055% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.055% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.055% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.055% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.055% fail on Cable
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.055% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.77% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.055% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.055% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.055% fail on Leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Valves
    • 0.055% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.055% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.99% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.38% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
    • 0.055% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.055% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.055% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.055% fail on Hose
      • 0.055% fail on System
    • 0.49% fail on Bumpers (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.055% fail on Chassis
      • 0.055% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.055% fail on Doors
      • 0.055% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.055% fail on Door condition
    • 0.055% fail on Seats
      • 0.055% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.055% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.055% fail on Cabs
      • 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.055% fail on Window
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.055% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.33% fail on Compression ignition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering linkage components (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.055% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.055% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.27% fail on Steering play
      • 0.27% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.055% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment
    • 0.49% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages