SsangYong Kyron MOT Results

Registered in 2006
57.3% pass rate
from 96 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the SsangYong Kyron is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (78% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 4.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 4.2% fail on Electronic stability control (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.0% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 4.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Driver's door (23 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Door condition (25 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.0% fail on Door condition
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Tank
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment
  • 1.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages