SEAT Toledo MOT Results

Registered in 2015
72.4% pass rate
from 972 tests in 2021
(42% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Toledo is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Brakes (90% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (85% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.10% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.31% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (46% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp levelling device (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Position lamps (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Position lamp (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.4% fail on Suspension (97% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Springs
      • 0.82% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.82% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.10% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.93% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.93% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Undertray (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's seat
  • 3.2% fail on Visibility
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Airbags
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.51% fail on Steering
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.10% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Toledo (2012 - 2018)
    Looks like a conventional saloon but is actually a hatchback. Huge boot space. Good quality and impressively spacious interior. Great value for money and an ideal family car.

    Search Good Garages