MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SAAB » 9-3 » 2010

SAAB 9-3 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
65.5% pass rate
from 4,186 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the SAAB 9-3 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.98% fail on Suspension arms (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.72% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.096% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.048% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.072% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.048% fail on Cable
        • 0.024% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.096% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Pedal
      • 0.048% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.072% fail on Parking brake control (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Lever (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.024% fail on Servos
  • 5.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.048% fail on Dipswitch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.91% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.072% fail on Side repeaters (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.096% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Rear fog lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Rear fog lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.024% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.096% fail on Electrical equipment (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.024% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (16% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.072% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.024% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.024% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.65% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 3.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.50% fail on Doors (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
      • 0.024% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
    • 0.45% fail on Transmission (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.024% fail on Joints
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.072% fail on System (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.024% fail on Tank
      • 0.024% fail on Pipe
    • 0.096% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.096% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Sub-frame condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Body
      • 0.072% fail on Other body component
      • 0.024% fail on Panel
    • 0.024% fail on Chassis
      • 0.024% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.024% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 3.2% fail on Visibility (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.072% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
      • 0.048% fail on Rams (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.024% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Steering play
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.024% fail on Airbags
      • 0.024% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.024% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.024% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages