MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » 75 » 2000

Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.2% pass rate
from 705 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Springs (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring (88% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.71% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.57% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt
          • 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.28% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.85% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Airbags
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 7.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.85% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
      • 0.14% fail on Body condition
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.28% fail on Undertray (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (74% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.43% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.57% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.57% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Pump
  • 0.85% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.85% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.14% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages