Rover 400 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
64.2% pass rate
from 162 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Boot lid (33 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Boot lid condition (39 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Tank
      • 0.62% fail on Pipe
  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.62% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.62% fail on Horn
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension
    • 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.62% fail on Axles
      • 0.62% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Brakes (61% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.62% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 0.62% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.62% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.62% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.62% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages