Rover 25 MOT Results

Registered in 2000

60.2% pass rate

from 822 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 7.2% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.12% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.61% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.61% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Belts
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.73% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.36% fail on Hose (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Tank
  - 0.12% fail on Pipe
  - 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.61% fail on Chassis
  - 0.61% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.24% fail on Body
  - 0.12% fail on Panel
  - 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.24% fail on Doors
  - 0.12% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.12% fail on Door condition
  - 0.12% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.12% fail on Door condition
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
- 0.12% fail on Seats
  - 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.4% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.85% fail on Side repeaters
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.24% fail on Switch (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
11% fail on Brakes
- 8.6% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 4.6% fail on Rbt (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.85% fail on Rbt
      - 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.12% fail on Cable
    - 0.12% fail on Brake slack adjuster
  - 0.12% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.12% fail on Brake discs
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.61% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.61% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.36% fail on Lever
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.12% fail on Hand lever
7.8% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.61% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.61% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.49% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.24% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.12% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Axles
  - 0.12% fail on Axle
5.4% fail on Visibility (31% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on View to rear
  - 0.24% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.73% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (52% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.6% fail on Spark ignition (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (43% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.12% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.24% fail on Other leaks
4.0% fail on Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
0.61% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Power steering
  - 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.36% fail on Registration plates