Rover 200 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
65.3% pass rate
from 147 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 0.68% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.68% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.1% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.68% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.68% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.68% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.68% fail on Chassis
      • 0.68% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.68% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Panel
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.68% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.68% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Hand lever
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.68% fail on Washers
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.68% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.68% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages